Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology
PLANT MODELLING GROUP
German version of this page / Deutsche Version dieser Seite
Publications of the research group
Winfried Kurth, mathematician and computer scientist
Research focus: Further development of formal languages and software
tools for dynamical 3D plant models in the framework of ecosystem
methods for the evaluation and formalization
of quantitative morphological data, computer graphics
Individual homepage: http://www.uni-forst.gwdg.de/~wkurth
e-mail: wk((at)) informatik.uni-goettingen.de
Former members of staff:
Helge Dzierzon, forest scientist
Research focus: Forest stand modelling, statistical data analysis,
comparisons between tree models, tools for discretisation and analysis
of forest trees and stands
Individual homepage: http://www.uni-forst.gwdg.de/~wkurth/memb_hd.html
e-mail: hdzierz((at)) gmail.com
Ulrike Singer, forest scientist
Research focus: 3D visualisation of forest stands and landscapes,
object-oriented modelling, graphical interfaces
Individual homepage: http://www.uni-forst.gwdg.de/~wkurth/memb_us.html
e-mail: usinger((at)) uni-forst.gwdg.de
Michael Schulte, biologist
Research focus: Hydraulic architecture, gas exchange and stomatal
control in trees, process-oriented modelling and model validation,
application and further development of the software
Individual homepage: http://www.uni-forst.gwdg.de/~wkurth/memb_ms.html
e-mail: mi-schu((at)) t-online.de
Gustavo Anzola, forest scientist
Research focus: Linkage of different structural plant models and
process-oriented models (AMAP, HYDRA, HYDRO, GROGRA), inclusion of stress
factors in 3D growth models
Individual homepage: http://www.uni-forst.gwdg.de/~wkurth/memb_ga.html
e-mail: ganzola((at)) web.de
The group is participant of the Forest Ecosystem Research Centre Göttingen.
Programme Modélisation des Plantes (AMAP team) at the CIRAD (Montpellier, France)
LIGNUM team at the Finnish Forest Research Centre METLA (Finland)
Department of Growth and Yield at the Forest Research Station of Lower Saxony, Göttingen
Chair for Forest Growth Modelling, Technical University of Munich
Department of ecology and ecosystem research at the Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute, University of Göttingen, Prof. Dr. Christoph Leuschner
IPK Gatersleben, Dr. Gerhard Buck-Sorlin
Center for Environmental Systems Research, University of Kassel
Institute of Forest Ecology at the University of Brno (Czech Republic), Prof. Dr. Jan Cermák.
Further ecosystem research centres in Germany:
Plant Architecture Information Systems (PAIS)
Model dokumentation database UFIS
Environment, Forestry, Global Change, Simulation etc. (by Michael Sonntag)
German AL workshops
Jan T. Kim's link page with AL links
Plant modelling in the narrower sense:
Team of Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz (Calgary)
Team of Peter Room (Queensland) (there are also further links, literature and software)
SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE RESEARCH APPROACH:
The rule-based language of "stochastic sensitive growth grammars" as an extension of parametric L-systems (Prusinkiewicz & Lindenmayer 1990) was developed to describe algorithmically the changement of the morphology of forest trees in time, taking endogenous and exogenous factors into account, and to create systematically 3-dimensional simulations of tree crowns. At different tree species, mainly at spruce, morphological measurements were carried out to get a basis for the design and parameterization of such rule systems.
The software GROGRA (Growth Grammar Interpreter; Kurth 1994) creates time series of 3-dimensional crown structures from the rules; the basic elements of these structures (annual shoots) can additionally bear non-geometrical attributes. Furthermore, GROGRA contains several analysis tools and data interfaces.
The generated architectures serve as an "ecomorphological basis model" for different process-oriented simulation models. There is already realized a model of tree-internal water flow (HYDRA; Früh 1995), based on the artificial tree structures.
The project is associated with the Forest Ecosystem Research Centre, University of Göttingen. It is financed by the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, German association for the advancement of science) in the form of several subprojects.
Keywords: plant architecture, architectural plant model, 3D plant model, virtual plant, Lindenmayer system, L system, L-system, growth grammar, morphological model, plant morphological development, branching architecture, tree architecture, virtual tree, 3D tree model, structural plant model, functional-structural model, FSTM, sensitivity, sensitive L-system, structure-process-linkage, plant growth simulation, tree hydraulic architecture, tree water flow, GROGRA, HYDRA
MOTIVATION, AIMS OF RESEARCH:
The development of the central-European forests during the next decades will be influenced on the one hand by the increasingly fostered "close-to-nature" forms of silviculture, on the other hand by various unplanned anthropogenous impacts (nutrient depositions, groundwater depletion, possible climatic change). The classical yield tables, which were developed from long-term measurements and were tailored to conventional treatment practices, loose their reliability under these circumstances (Spellmann 1991). Thus, there is now at first a need for a causally oriented understanding of the interrelations of forest trees with their environment. The forest-damage research of the last two decades, too, arrived at gaps of knowledge in the foundations of its research area (e.g., Abschlußdokumentation... 1993).
The state of theory formation in tree physiology and in silvicultural growth studies manifests itself - like in other scientific areas - in the models, which describe the relations in precise mathematical terms (and today find often their algorithmic realization in the form of computer simulations). Besides the purely empirical-deductive stand models, which are obviously insufficient for causal insights, there are currently two much-discussed directions of development in plant modelling:
(1) Process-oriented models which quantify the amount and dynamics of the pools of C, H2O, N, and energy (e.g. McMurtrie & Wolf 1983, Mäkelä 1986, Bossel & Schäfer 1989, Sloboda & Pfreundt 1989, Bossel 1996).
(2) Structure-oriented models which reproduce the 3-dimensional tree and stand architecture on a morphological basis and thus make available a common structural matrix for light interception, flows of C, H2O, N, and for mechanical processes (Reffye 1979, Bell 1986, Prusinkiewicz & Lindenmayer 1990, Kurth 1994).
However, to obtain progress in understanding tree growth and its control, it is necessary to consider the relations between branching structure and processes and hence to unify both approaches of development. It has to be recognized that the manipulation of the 3-dimensional structure of stands is the main way of control in forestry!
The functional significance of the branched structure of trees was meanwhile multiply confirmed:
A further effect of considering morphology in models of plant growth is that thereby also the relevance of endogenous, genetically-determined patterns comes into consideration - a useful corrective to extremely "envirocentric" process models (Ford 1992).
In fact, since about 10 years one can recognize in ecophysiological and ecosystemic modelling an orientation towards approaches which join the processes with the morphology of trees and tree stands. For different categories of processes, a gradual increase in difficulty results:
(1) Processes which occur - despite being determined by stand structure - outside the trees or at the boundary zone tree - environment: water flow in the soil, light interception. These are describable in terms of physics and hence to be modelled most easily (in principle).
(2) Processes in the interior of the trees which are still to a great extent describable in terms of physics. For the water flow in the tree, which belongs to this category, meanwhile the first whole-tree models were developed (Tyree 1988, Früh 1995); however, they do not yet reflect the close mutual dependence between the hydraulic systems of tree and soil.
(3) Processes in the trees which are mainly biologically determined, like carbon allocation and growth. Here, also, first modelling approaches which respect the relation to structure were developed (Ford & Ford 1990, Perttunen et al. 1996, Deleuze 1996), however, generally here only a very laborious progress in the theoretical synthesis of the various empirical material is to be expected, and this depends, after all, also on progress concerning the process categories (1) and (2).
Processes of the categories (2) and, even more, (3) are subject to biological control mechanisms which can only be understood on the level of the individual, i.e. of the organism (the tree). Thus, a purely stand-related consideration (even if structures are recognized) is no longer adequate here. Instead, for a causal understanding of processes of categories (2) and (3) and of their control, an individual-oriented research and modelling approach is well-suited, which finds applications also in other contexts of ecology (deAngelis & Gross 1992) and is supported on the side of computer science by object-oriented techniques (Breckling 1996). This approach is consistent with the above-mentioned structural plant models insofar, as - depending on the considered process and following the concept of modularity in botany (White 1979) - the tree itself can be dissolved into a hierarchical system of individual axes, growth units, internodes etc. (Rey et al. 1997), down to the meristems as the very entities where growth is to be localized and can be understood as the result of local influences as well as of biological rules in the hierarchical system "tree". Modular structural-functional models are thus capable to establish a bridge - built on firm theoretical knowledge - between process studies and the phenomenologically-oriented description level of botany (crown and shoot damage patterns, morphological vitality assessment: Roloff 1989).
This innovative approach in the area of ecophysiological theory formation and modelling was till today scarcely followed in Germany, and on an international level only by few workgroups. On December 12-13, 1996 the first "Workshop on Functional-Structural Tree Models" took place in Helsinki. The second FSTM Workshop (October 12-15, 1998, in Clermont Ferrand) attracted an even larger number of scientists from around the world. Here it became obvious that we have to do with a rapidly expanding, promising research area.
Despite of some recent progress, the models are still rather deficient concerning the integration of structure and processes, hence blocking the causal understanding:
Last not least, there is a lack of well-founded simplifications of the process models and growth models - simplifications which are based on a theoretically-founded knowledge of system behaviour and which can answer application-oriented questions: e.g. growth reactions to forest operations, relations between parameters of tree architecture and dynamics of water flow in the tree, light response curves of tree stands.
Abschlußdokumentation zum Forschungsschwerpunkt "Luftverunreinigungen und Waldschäden" des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (1993), Hg.: Ministerium für Umwelt, Raumordnung und Landwirtschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, Düsseldorf.
Bassow, S.; Ford, E.D., and Kiester, A.R. (1990): A critique of carbon-based tree growth models. In: Process Modeling of Forest Growth Responses to Environmental Stress (Eds.: R.K. Dixon, R.S. Meldahl, G.A. Ruark, W.G. Warren), Timber Press, Portland, p.50-57.
Bell, A.D. (1986): The simulation of branching patterns in modular organisms. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London, B 313, 143-159.
Blanck, K.; Lamersdorf, N.; Dohrenbusch, A., and Murach, D. (1997): Response of Norway spruce forest ecosystem to drought / rewetting experiments at Solling. Water, Air and Soil Pollution (to appear).
Bossel, H. (1996): TREEDYN 3 forest simulation model. Ecological Modelling, 90, 187-227.
Bossel, H., and Schäfer, H. (1989): Generic simulation model of forest growth, carbon and nitrogen dynamics, and application to tropical acacia and European spruce. Ecological Modelling, 48, 221-265.
Breckling, B. (1996): An individual based model for the study of pattern and process in plant ecology. An application of object oriented programming. EcoSys, 4, 241-254.
Buck-Sorlin, G. (1997): Crown architecture and modeling of oak (Quercus robur L., Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wales, Bangor (295 p.).
Caldwell, M.M. (1987): Plant architecture and resource competition. In: E.D. Schulze & H. Zwölfer (Eds.), Potentials and Limitations of Ecosystem Analysis. Ecological Studies, 61. Springer, Berlin, 164-179.
DeAngelis, D.L., and Gross, L.J. (1992): Individual Based Models and Approaches in Ecology. Populations, Communities and Ecosystems. Chapman & Hall, New York.
Deleuze, Ch. (1996): Pour une dendrométrie fonctionnelle: Essai sur l’intégration de connaissances écophysiologiques dans les modèles de production ligneuse. Thèse, Université Claude Bernard - Lyon 1 (305 p.).
Ford, E.D. (1992): The control of tree structure and productivity through the interaction of morphological development and physiological processes. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 153, S147-S162.
Ford, R., and Ford, E.D. (1990): Structure and basic equations of a simulator for branch growth in the Pinaceae. J. Theor. Biol., 146, 1-13.
Fournier, M.; Rogier, P.; Costes, E., et Jaeger, M. (1993): Modélisation mécanique des vibrations propres d’un arbre soumis aux vents, en fonction de sa morphologie. Annales des Sciences Forestières, 50, 401-412.
Früh, Th. (1995): Entwicklung eines Simulationsmodells zur Untersuchung des Wasserflusses in der verzweigten Baumarchitektur. Berichte des FZW Göttingen, Ser. A, Bd. 131.
Grote, R. (1993): Physiologische Reaktionen an Altfichten (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) unter Trockenstreßbedingungen im Solling. Berichte des FZW Göttingen, Ser. A, Bd. 103.
Gruber, F. (1992): Dynamik und Regeneration der Gehölze. Berichte des FZW Göttingen, Ser. A, Bd. 86.
Jones, H.G., and Sutherland, R.A. (1991): Stomatal control of xylem embolism. Plant, Cell and Environment, 14, 607-612.
Knyazikhin, Yu.; Kranigk, J.; Miessen, G.; Panfyorov, O.; Vygodskaya, N., and Gravenhorst, G. (1996): Modelling three-dimensional distribution of photosynthetically active radiation in sloping coniferous stands. Biomass and Bioenergy, 11, 189-200.
Knyazikhin, Yu.; Kranigk, J.; Myneni, R.; Panfyorov, O., and Gravenhorst, G. (1997): Influence of small-scale structure on radiative transfer and photosynthesis in vegetation canopies. Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres (submitted).
Knyazikhin, Yu.; Miessen, G.; Panfyorov, O., and Gravenhorst, G. (1997b): Small-scale study of three-dimensional distribution of photosynthetically active radiation in a forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. (in press).
Kranigk, J.; Gruber, F.; Heimann, J., und Thorwest, A. (1994): Ein Modell für die Kronenraumstruktur und die räumliche Verteilung der Nadeloberfläche in einem Fichtenbestand. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 165, 193-197.
Küppers, M. (1991): Die Bedeutung des Wechselspiels von Photosynthese, Blattpopulation und pflanzlicher Architektur für Wachstum und Konkurrenzkraft. In: Populationsbiologie der Pflanzen (Hg.: B. Schmid, J. Stöcklin), Birkhäuser, Basel, 165-178.
Kurth, W. (1994): Morphological models of plant growth. Possibilities and ecological relevance. Ecological Modelling, 75/76, 299-308.
Kurth, W. (1994b): Growth Grammar Interpreter GROGRA 2.4. Introduction and reference manual. Berichte des FZW Göttingen, Ser. B, Bd. 38.
Kurth, W., und Lanwert, D. (1995): Biometrische Grundlagen für ein dynamisches Architekturmodell der Fichte (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Allgemeine Forst- u. Jagd-Zeitung, 166, 177-184.
Kurth, W., and Sloboda, B. (1997): Growth grammars simulating trees -- an extension of L-systems incorporating local variables and sensitivity. Silva Fennica, 31, 285-295.
Leuschner, Ch. (1993): Patterns of soil water depletion under coexisting oak and beech trees in a mixed stand. Phytocoenologia, 23, 19-33.
Leuschner, Ch. (1997a): Wasserstreß-Antwort auf Blatt-, Wurzel- und Stammebene von Rotbuchen und Traubeneichen in einem Altholz-Mischbestand in NW-Deutschland. Ecosys, Suppl. 20, 11-24.
Leuschner, Ch. (1997b): Water extraction by tree fine roots in the forest floor of a temperate Fagus-Quercus forest. Ann. Sci. Forest. (in press).
Leuschner, Ch., and Senock, R. (1998): Water flux dynamics in small diameter roots of a fast growing tropical tree. Plant Soil (in press).
Mäkelä, A. (1986): Implications of the pipe model theory on dry matter partitioning and height growth in trees. J. Theor. Biol., 123, 103-220.
McMurtrie, R., and Wolf, L. (1983): Above- and below-ground growth of forest stands: a carbon budget model. Annals of Botany, 52, 437-448.
Middelhoff, U., and Breckling, B. (1998): Nutrient uptake and growth of an Alnus glutinosa stand: An individual based model on the interaction of plant and soil. Bayreuther Forum Ökologie, 52, 189-203.
Neemann, G., and Stickan, W. (1991): Carbohydrate partitioning and storage in beech saplings of a mature stands understorey - studies of carbon balance in a montane beech forest (Fagus sylvatica L.) in the Solling area, FRG. Proceedings of the First European Symposium on Terrestrial Ecosystems: Forests and Woodlands. Florence (Italy), May 20-24, 1991.
Nielsen, C.C.N. (1990): Einflüsse von Pflanzenabstand und Stammzahlhaltung auf Wurzelform, Wurzelbiomasse, Verankerung sowie auf die Biomassenverteilung im Hinblick auf die Standfestigkeit der Fichte. J.D. Sauerländer’s, Frankfurt.
Perttunen, J.; Sievänen, R.; Nikinmaa, E.; Salminen, H.; Saarenmaa, H., and Väkevä, J. (1996): LIGNUM: A tree model based on simple structural units. Annals of Botany, 77, 87-98.
Prusinkiewicz, P., and Lindenmayer, A. (1990): The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. Springer, New York.
Reffye, Ph. de (1979): Modélisation de l’architecture des arbres par des processus stochastiques. Simulation spatiale des modèles tropicaux sous l’effet de la pesanteur. Application au Coffea robusta. Thèse, Université de Paris-Sud, Centre d’Orsay (196 p.).
Reffye, Ph. de; Fourcaud, Th.; Blaise, F.; Barthélémy, D., and Houllier, F. (1997): An ecophysiological model for tree growth and tree architecture. Silva Fennica, 31, 297-311.
Rey, H.; Godin, C., et Guedon, Y. (1997): Vers une représentation formelle des plantes. In: Modélisation et Simulation de l’Architecture des Végétaux (Eds.: J. Bouchon et al.). INRA, Paris, 139-171.
Roloff, A. (1989): Kronenentwicklung und Vitalitätsbeurteilung ausgewählter Baumarten der gemäßigten Breiten. J. D. Sauerländer, Frankfurt a. M.
Sloboda, B., and Pfreundt, J. (1989): Tree and stand growth. In: Artificial Intelligence and Growth Models for Forest Management Decisions, FWS, Blacksburg (Virginia), 119-153.
Spellmann, H. (1991): Beiträge der Forsteinrichtung und Ertragskunde für ein forstliches Informationssystem. Forst und Holz, 1991-H. 3, 57-65.
Tyree, M.T., and Alexander (1993): Plant water relations and the effects of elevated CO2: a review and suggestions for future research. Vegetatio, 104/105, 47-62.
Tyree, M.T., and Ewers, F. (1991): Tansley Review No. 34: The hydraulic architecture of trees and other woody plants. New Phytologist, 119, 345-360.
White, J. (1979): The plant as a metapopulation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10, 109-145.
Zimmermann, M.H. (1978): Hydraulic architecture of some diffuse-porous trees. Canadian Journal of Botany, 56, 2286-2295.
Zimmermann, M.H. (1983): Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap. Springer, Berlin.
Department for Ecoinformatics, Biometrics and Forest Growth
University of Göttingen
Büsgenweg 4, 37077 Göttingen
Phone +49-551-39-9715, -3464
E-mail: wkurth((at)) informatik.uni-goettingen.de
Back to Ecoinformatics homepage
Back to Forestry Faculty homepage
To the homepage of the Chair for Graphics Systems at the University of Cottbus (where Winfried Kurth was active from 2001 until 2008)
To this website this disclaimer (in German) applies.
Last modifications: October 10, 2008